Cervantes Chatt & Prince has a broad Real Estate practice. From developers to residential purchasers, the CCP Real Estate practice group brings experience, competency and advocacy to every transaction. From contract execution through negotiation and closing, CCP ensures its clients have the guidance and advice they need to procced with confidence.
Residential clients can take comfort knowing the attorneys at CCP close hundreds of transactions every year. Whether you are a first-time purchaser, looking to downsize, or seeking a second home, CCP has the experience and knowledge to ensure your interests are front and center of your transaction.
Commercial and Developer clients benefit from the fact that CCP is a full service firm. In addition to real estate transactions, CCP attorneys represent commercial clients in 1031 exchanges, drafting leases, landlord-tenant matters, constructions litigation, title matters, and building code violations. The real estate practices group has the depth of staff and breadth of services to ensure no legal issues jeopardize return on investment. From portfolio purchases to distressed property opportunities, CCP assists commercial clients from negotiation, through due diligence and on to closing to achieve goals with efficiency and cost effectiveness.
With offices on downtown Chicago as well as the suburbs, CCP represents clients in Northern Illinois as far north as Winnebago county and as far south as Kendall county. Rest assured, whether dreams or opportunities take you, CCP will make sure you get there. Consultations are always free so give us a call and let us start you on your way to achieving your goals.
PRACTICE AREA HIGHLIGHT
In "Hometown Condominium Ass’n No. 2 v. Mohammed, 2018 IL App (2d) 171030" Bob Prince of Cervantes Chatt & Prince successfully argued before the Second Appellate District of Illinois where a third-party purchaser at a foreclosure sale refused to make payment following confirmation of the judicial sale thereby failing to extinguish the Association's lien for assessments. Though the third-party purchaser did make payment on the eve of trial, the Appellate Court held because the payment was not made until 17 months after the judicial sale, the Association's lien was not extinguished by the payment and the third-party purchaser owed the entire amount of unpaid assessments for the unit.